Church Leadership Conversations

  • What can I do with a major or minor in Christian Educational Ministries at Taylor University?

    Taylor students (and their parents) often ask: what can I do with a minor or major in Christian Educational Ministries? This is the handout we give them. See below.

    To learn more about what courses make up a Christian Educational Ministries major or minor, click here.

    If you want to know how to find a Ministry position, see my post about that here. 

    If you’re curious, I taught two sections of "Teaching and Learning Strategies," two sections of "Program and Curriculum Development" and the "Senior Capstone" course this year. See my earlier posts about the sites we visited in Philadelphia and Pittsburgh and relevant books and articles on ministry in Philadelphia .

    My wife Amy has taught three sections of "Personal Foundations for Ministry" and a course entitled "Ministry By Women in the Contemporary Context."

    Amy and I are both majored in Christian Educational Ministries at Taylor University and graduated in 1998.

    Opportunities for Christian Educational Ministries Majors and Minors

    Church (From small to megachurch) – Pastor, Youth Pastor, Associate Pastor, Christian Education Director. Pastor of specialized ministry: children, youth, Jr. high, Sr. high, student ministries, family ministries, college ministry, young adults, next generation, singles, men’s, women’s, adult ministries, pastoral care, worship arts, outreach, missions, evangelism, discipleship, spiritual formation, special needs, small groups, recreational ministries, administration, executive pastor, church planter, etc.

    Para Church –Youth For Christ, Young Life, InterVarsity, Campus Crusade, Navigators, etc.

    Missions – trainer, linguist, church planter, discipler, evangelist, curriculum developer, house parent, teacher, community development, student mobilizer, short term missions leader, rehabilitation.

    Inner City – church planter, youth center director, ministry with youth, community development worker, recreation director, house parent.

    Christian Camping – conference, wilderness, director, assistant director, retreat center director

    Christian College – resident hall director, student development leader, professor of Christian education, student ministry director, practicum supervisor.

    Writing – Sunday school/children, youth, adult curriculum, books, magazine editor, book editor.

    Christian high school – Bible teacher, director of missions, coach.

    Chaplain – hospital, military

    Media Specialist – film, music, video, communications.

    Training for some of these positions could be further supplemented by taking courses outside of the Christian Educational Ministries department (Accounting, Biblical Literature, Church Music, Communication – New Media, Early Childhood Education, English Writing, Intercultural Studies / Missions, International Business, International Studies, Management, Physical Education, Psychology, Social Work, or Sociology).

  • Strengths of the Purpose Driven Church and Sober Advice For Those Considering the Megachurch

    I first read The Purpose-Driven Church: Growth Without Compromising Your Message & Mission by Rick Warren soon after it came out in 1995. I am now teaching a Christian ministry course at Taylor University entitled "Program and Curriculum Development." I require my students to read the book because of how influential this book has been. I don't want them to be in the dark at a staff meeting or conference when people refer to it. Ten years after reading the book and being involved in pastoral leadership during that whole time, it has been interesting to read the book again. There are some definite strengths of the book. But I also have some cautions for my students about the megachurch as well.

    The huge strengths of The Purpose Driven Church

    Here are notes from my lecture about the strengths of the book: 

    Programming should be inspired by vision, moved by need and thoughtful about its approach.

    • Experiment. Warren admits that his strategy was mostly to just try things out! Emulate him in this way! p. 27-29 
    • Consistency. A family will not be healthy if it has 10 fathers but might be healthy with one. Consider committing to a place for the long haul. p. 31

    Programming should be done with purpose, balance and discipline.

    • Balance p. 49, 76, 122. Left to our own devices, we will do what we are most passionate about and neglect other aspects of the biblical mandate.
    • There is a time to pray and a time to take responsibility. p. 58 There is a time to put our heads together and try to solve a problem with the brains and abilities God has given us rather than just spiritualize problems.
    • Major on the majors. p. 89 If your church is majoring on something like a choir, which is pretty peripheral to God's purposes, think about majoring on something more important.
    • No program is meant to last forever. p. 89-90. If it has stopped being useful, nix the program.
    • Need a leader for every program. p. 90. Do not start a program without leadership.

    Programming should be done with awareness of reality

    • Levels of commitment will differ. p. 131-136. Program in light of the fact that you are ministering to people with different levels of commitment.
    • Pay attention to people. Yes, target people but realize that the kingdom of God is about more than one demographic. Warren targeted Saddleback Sam but admits God has led them to minister to many new targets. p. 160.

    Programming should be done with hospitality and excellence

    • Emphasize hospitality – welcoming people – over attractiveness though they are similar. Warren and Saddleback are very hospitable and we can learn from this. All churches think they are friendly but most are not in reality.
    • Pursue excellence but realize that the smaller the congregation, the less you will be able to do what the world would judge as excellent and that is ok. Recognize what you can do well (160) (for example, fellowship) and yet also strive to do the other purposes well as you can (worship, discipleship, evangelism, service).
    • The importance of outreach. p. 50 Most churches never reach any non-Christians and essentially serve the believer. Warren and friends remind us of the importance of reaching the lost. "The Church is the only society that exists for the benefit of those who are not its members" (William Temple).
    • Think like an unbeliever. p.189 Do not try to reach out by using Christian jargon like "Come hear the preaching of the inerrant Word of God."
    • Encourage people to find a place they can thrive in ministry. It is not about filling spots. p. 382 They will most likely need to experiment. I have taught the SHAPE ("spiritual gifts, heart, abilities, personalities, experiences) assessment course and the most important message is for people to jump in and try something. p. 387

    I critique Warren's approach in my posts
    A wider target: Deconstructing and redeploying the Seeker Sensitive Service planning of The Purpose Driven Church
    and
    Why pastors should be both goal-setting fanatics and cynics
    but also give some general words of caution below.


    Introduction to the Megachurch

    In the next sections, I do not focus specifically on Rick Warren's Saddleback Church or his The Purpose Driven Church but rather the megachurch in general.

    I received the following excellent statistical introduction to the megachurch from Bill Easum's article The Exponential Church: Learning From America’s Largest and Fastest-Growing Congregations

    "Twenty years ago American megachurches (more than 2,000 attendance) numbered just over two dozen. Today, they exceed more than 830, with more than 30 now exceeding 10,000 worshipper- launching a whole new category we call the "gigachurch." Since the late 1950s, the time it has taken for a church to grow large has been cut in half almost every decade. Ten of the churches started in 1990 reached attendances of 5,000 to 18,000 in one decade.What is driving this growth? The factors are many, including the migration of people to urban centers, word-of-mouth, sharpened leadership skills, churches becoming multigenerational and most recently, Web site access, TV exposure and megachurches teaching other churches through seminars, books and curriculum."

    I had never heard of the gigachurch and I don't think that terminology has taken off yet but it does make sense to me to differentiate the 30 churches over 10,000 attendance from the 800 over 2,000 but less than 10,000.

    Because the megachurch is big, strengths and weaknesses are exaggerated. It is great to study because it has systems for everything and they are often visible on the grand scale.

    Not all people thrive in a megachurch. Consider the following.

    If you grew up in a megachurch, you may intuitively understand who tends to fit there. But if you didn't, consider the following.

    • Because it is a large organization, it has to function as one. Thus business skills and larger-organization leadership skills are sought after.
    • Because the megachurch is always trying to make things better and this is visible to thousands of people on a weekly basis, it can tend to be a high pressure, result-oriented environment.
    • Because vision-casting is needed to rally volunteers and you are often known by your brief public speaking opportunities, outstanding public-speaking skills are an asset.
    • Because cutting edge technology is often used to keep track of lots of people and do ministry programming on a large-scale, technology skills are a sought after.
    • My friend writes: "Like those in big business, mega-church workers need to bring at least one towering strength to the enterprise. It's not a place for those who can do many things with average skill; it's a place for those who can do one or two things with tremendous skill. Excellence is of such high value that only over-achievers need apply. Smaller church workers can be generalists; most mega-church workers have to be specialists."
    • If you walk into a megachurch or visit a website of a megachurch and are attracted by the facility and professionalism, this may be your thing. If you have a bad taste in your mouth and feel like it seems fake, you should run the other direction because it probably isn't you.

    Crucial Issues to Consider While Working at a Megachurch:

    1. Think about what ministry "success" really means.

    It is customary (not just in the megachurch) to equate success with the A, B, C's (Attendance, Buildings, Cash) or you can also say it as the three B's (Bodies, Buildings, Budget). How can we measure quantitatively some things that are hard to quantify (discipleship, inner growth, godly character development, true worshipfulness)? Randy Frazee, author of The Connecting Church and formerly pastor of Pantego Bible Church and Willow Creek, has tried to to create an assessment tool:The
    Christian Life Profile Assessment Tool Training Guide: Discovering the
    Quality of Your Relationships with God and Others in 30 Key Areas
    of 30 core competences which is a place to start.

    2. Take into account the location.

    Don't feel too proud of yourself if your church grows and you are in a geographical area that is booming economically and growing quickly. Don't be too discouraged regarding your church growth if you are in an area that is suffering economically. Megachurches often (but not always) occur in growing areas where there is a Target, Starbucks and new developments. In the megachurch game (a spoof on megachurch leadership) there are different levels of difficulty:

    "A suburban church plant (for those who want it easy or just starting out). Or pastor an inner-city, multi-ethnic 80 year old church with 50 members and $1 million mortgage debt (for those who really want a challenge)."

    3. Do not uncritically accept the idea that "quantity frequently indicates quality."

    Rick Warren writes, "Health produces growth . . . Quality produces quantity" (p.49, 51). Natural Church Development, another school of thought, concludes that of the major eight positive characteristics they look for in churches, only "Inspiring Worship" is most typically stronger in large churches.

    1. Empowering Leadership

    2. Gift-oriented Ministry

    3. Passionate Spirituality

    4. Functional Structures

    5. Inspiring Worship

    6. Holistic Small Groups

    7. Need-oriented Evangelism

    8. Loving Relationships

    This makes sense that people would assume that all the characteristics are stronger in a megachurch because when one visits a megachurch, people are often moved by the large-setting worship.

    4. Impact is not fame or joy.

    It is tempting to think that you are making a bigger impact if your ministry is famous. It is good to want to make a profound impact for God's kingdom. Go do it! You may not get noticed for it by Christianity Today but you may end up with a better family life, more joy, more friends, and more satisfaction than the famous Zondervan "____ Church" author. I'm told fame can be a pain–people who don't know you say all kinds of silly things about you and you don't know whether to respond or ignore it. Remember that "audience of One" concept (Luke 10:42).

    5. Consider making biblical reflection a priority.

    The megachurch is often characterized by a radical pragmatism that focuses on doing "whatever works." It can be very difficult with the weekly deadlines and pressure to thoughtfully consider the merits of a particular decision in light of biblical values. The thinking usually goes: "if it gets butts in seats, it is exposing people to the gospel, so it must be good." The megachurch may not appropriately value biblical reflection including the foundation of biblical reflection that is hopefully instilled in theological education / seminary.

    6. Consider carefully how to use resources.

    The megachurch often spends extraordinary amounts of money that might seem to be frivolous (the shuttle that brings people in from parking lot has video screens, etc.) Are there other ways that God might be calling the wealthy North American church to use its resources? Consider this question often.

    7. Understand biblical evangelism.

    The strength of the seeker megachurch is that it stresses outreach to the unchurched. I tell my students: "You're not allowed to throw stones at the seeker church unless you are committed to an equally intense evangelism approach (small groups that invite unchurched, Alpha program, 1-on-1 evangelism training, special seeker events, etc.)" However, the seeker church can also tend to get a bit over-focused on "getting souls into heaven" which may not reflect the totality of the message of Scripture.

    8. Consider discipleship in the seeker church.

    My friend writes: "When evangelism is the primary purpose of every Sunday's gathering…you're essentially doing 'crusade' ministry on a weekly basis. And if there's one thing that stadium crusades have taught us, it's that it's easier to draw a crowd than to disciple a crowd. As I recall, a study of the Billy Graham Association showed that about 4% of the respondents at their crusades ultimately wound up assimilated into a church. The mega-church might not be doing much better. I think discipling people may only be able to be done a few at a time."

    9. Consider discipleship in the non-seeker church.

    Some megachurches do not have weekend seeker services and a midweek believers service. They gear the weekend worship and preaching to believers. At least the seeker churches are spending the tremendous amount of resources on reaching the unchurched. The megachurches that are believer-centered need to doubly ask whether their expenditures are justified. Are they reaching the unchurched? Are people really growing in their discipleship? Attracting believers with a good show is even less justifiable than attracting unbelievers.

    10. Consider the consequences of over-valuing excellence.

    Another friend writes:

    "Oftentimes, one of the values of the megachurch, especially Willow Creek is 'Excellence honors God and inspires people.' It sounds nice, but the services can come across at times feeling fake, plastic and like a production. And if you are not excellent, you will not be up front very often. (Therefore, leadership development is at a minimum — it is much easier to fly in and pay an outside guest speaker than to allow younger, green behind the ears leaders in the church to grow in their teaching ability)."

    11. Consider the danger of a selfish mentality creeping in.

    My friend writes:

    "If not careful, it can truly breed an unhealthy consumerism mentality. Specializing in everything to cater to our every need (affinity groups, a cafe in the lobby, Sunday school programs for children that are incredible, etc) isn't always bad, but can foster a "its all about me" mentality."

    Note:

    For more information on specific megachurches, see the data compiled by the Hartford Institute for Religious Research here.

    See also the latest report by the Hartford Institute (Feb 2006). It is an excellent summary of the latest statistical findings regarding the megachurch. It is available as a free download here. They also have a church staff salary survey posted as well for free download at the Leadership Network. Large churches pay their pastors well!

  • Do Better Theology and Preaching by Learning from IM Slang

    Instant messenger users use a whole variety of acronyms and shorthand. For example, IMHO is "In My Humble Opinion" and ROFL is "Rolling On the Floor Laughing." To learn more, listen to the 5 minute report on NPR here and better yet see the exhaustive list of lingo on Netlingo.com

    Asked whether Shakespeare would approve of this affront to traditional English, professor David Crystal says this: "He would have loved it. I have no doubt. The IM people extend the range of the language, the expressiveness of the language, the richness of the language and they infuse it with play."

    How to Do Better Theology and Preaching by Learning from IM Slang

    1. IM slang reminds us that stating things in fresh ways is delightful for both writer and reader, preacher and listener. (In addition to Shakespeare, this reminds me of Mark Twain and Winston Churchill and their fun with words. See my post here about the Mark Twain Ken Burns DVD). The apostle Paul also made up words a bit (e.g the "super-apostles" in 2 Cor 11:5 and 12:11). Germans are well known for making up their own words to try to capture new trends in theology: think Heilsgeschichte = "salvation history." Stating things in fresh ways in theology is supposed be fun and enlightening – not the bane of generations who follow you. (Ever read any poetry? It is supposed to be fun and enlightening too.) As a professor, I encourage my students to put what they’re learning in their own words. We should not be immediately fearful of people who don’t use the categories and terms that everyone has always used. Maybe they are orthodox in their theology but we just don’t recognize it because they are doing theology and having fun! What a concept! Or maybe they are sharp and seeing things we didn’t. Either way, let’s encourage them forward. Sure, it would be nice if they could sometimes "translate" or "approximate" what they are saying into traditional language so the old-timers could understand them but let’s not make them do this too soon. This is like making a poet explain their poetry in prose.

    2. We can be inspired by the style of these IM slang writers. The phrases put into slang by these young people are cutting in their clarity and brevity (e.g. GUD Geographically UnDesirable; ESO Equipment Smarter than Operator; RTBS Reason To Be Single; POS Parent Over Shoulder). They are also exuberant in their emotions from anger (as can be seen by lots of swear word shorthand) to hilarity (e.g. AWGTHTGTTA; Are We Going To Have To Go Through This Again; GD&R Grinning, Ducking and Running; LLTA Lots And Lots Of Thunderous Applause). They also tend to be humble and self-deprecating (e.g. GIWIST Gee, I Wish I’d Said That; IIRC If I Remember Correctly; WIT Wordsmith In Training). IM words tend to be relational because of all forms of written communication, this one gets the fastest feedback (LYLAS Love You Like A Sister). If we can ever do theology and preaching with forthrightness, brevity, exuberance, humility and relationality we will be doing a whole lot right.