Church Leadership Conversations

  • Aristotle on Facebook and Twitter

    "To be a friend to many people in the complete kind of friendship is not possible . . . it is necessary to get experience and to come into intimate acquaintance with each other, which is of the utmost difficulty.  But it is possible to be pleased by many people for usefulness and pleasure, since there are many people of those sorts, and their services are provided in a short time" (Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, Book Eight, 1158a, (trans. Joe Sachs). 

    Aristotle: Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics

    Aristotle is right.  In order to have strong friendships, we need to spend significant time with one another.  We need people who believe in us, tell us the truth, and support us.  I think of small groups, phone calls, long walks, and long drives with friends. 

    But I admit that I have come to also really enjoy Facebook and Twitter.  My Facebook friends are people I know from real life (high school, college, church, seminary, colleagues, etc.)  On Twitter, I follow some Christian leaders, authors and pastors.  My Facebook Status Updates and Posted Items tend to be more amusing and personal–about my kids, witty remarks, etc.  My Twitter tweets are more thoughtful comments usually pertaining to church leadership and theology.

    Interestingly I think I exchange what Aristotle calls "pleasure" through Facebook–joking around–seeing what my friends are up to.  I exchange what Aristotle calls "usefulness" through Twitter. 

    I think the usefulness and pleasure of Facebook and Twitter
    have to do with your particular life situation and personality.  Because I am usually
    either reading or watching my 3 and 1 year old boys and my laptop is nearby, it happens to fit
    my lifestyle.  My wife Amy
    on the other hand neither blogs, nor has Facebook or Twitter.  Instead she chats with people on
    the phone and at her workplace–our church.  Aristotle is on to something–we all need solid friendships of equality but we also all enjoy other relationships that bring us smiles (pleasure) and insight (usefulness).        

    Other info:

    If you are someone who knows me from real life, you can find my Facebook account here.

    If you are interested in church leadership and my blog, please follow me at my Twitter page.  Or you can just go check it out anonymously without joining Twitter. 

    I am reading Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics for Stanley Hauerwas's course Happiness, the Life of Virtue, and Friendship.  I have posted about that here.

    There are lots of interesting comments from Aristotle about relationships in book 8 of the Nicomachean Ethics that I thought were relevant to Facebook and Twitter.  You can access an old translation online for free.  For example, Aristotle addresses the issue of power in relationships.  In Twitter, power is obvious.  If you follow someone but they don't follow you, they are in the power position.  If they decide to follow you, you are equal.  In Facebook, everyone is equal because you both have to agree to be friends.  Now, there are people who accept everyone as a Facebook friend and follow everyone who follows you on Twitter, but this has some negative effects on the functioning of the applications–they are cluttered with people you really do not know.  

  • Letter to my kids on Obama’s Inauguration Day

    Dear Ryan (3) and Jacob (1),

    Barack Obama became president at noon today.  In some ways, today was not a special day.  As Christians, we affirm that there is only one king—the Lord Almighty and his kingdom is coming.  He is the king-elect and one day all will acknowledge that he is king.  Nothing today changed that and that is the breaking news.

    for us there is but one God, the Father, from whom all things came and for whom we live; and there is but one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom all things came and through whom we live. (1 Cor 8:6).

    But our citizenship is in heaven. And we eagerly await a Savior from there, the Lord Jesus Christ (Phil 3:20)

    But I also want to tell you something that you cannot yet understand—that I am happy today because what I perceive to be a good man—and an African-American man became president. 

    I wrote Obama a letter two years ago in January 2007—not because I supported him but because I saw potential in him.  By December 2007—before any primaries—I thought he would win.  I was not impressed by any of the other candidates.  I got Obama’s book Audacity of Hope and read it over Christmas from the library—shocked no one had it checked out already.  I told the library worker that I wanted to find out more about our next president—she gave me a funny look.  Obama won the Iowa primary January 3, 2008.  I blogged about his book January 17 when very little had been written about his faith.  I made the rather banal point that he was not an evangelical but was a pretty smart guy and a sincere Christian.  The main criticism then of Obama from evangelicals, and still today, is his stance on abortion.  We’ll see what he does on that issue—wildly different predictions still exist about what he will do.  Obama has some other flaws as well—virtually all of which he acknowledges—some unfortunate associations, some character blemishes, and the obvious one for all presidential candidates—ambition.  Furthermore, it is appropriate for all citizens of the USA—no actually, the world—to be afraid of a new president.  He has so much power and we only have an inkling of the decisions he will make.  He has the potential to do serious damage to the country and the world—people who do not trust him are understandably afraid.  We will know soon enough whether the hopeful or the skeptical were more perceptive. 

    But beyond those disclaimers, I wanted to tell you something else.  I wanted you to know that I am hopeful because I see in Obama some Christian characteristics.  I watched the campaign closely and I was impressed by his integrity and his ideals.  He seemed honest when others weren’t.  He did not tear people down.  He did his research.  He listened.  He seemed conscious of the poor and those in poor countries.  He resisted spouting ideology.  He resisted making promises he couldn’t deliver. 

    I also wanted to tell you that I am joyful because part of the breakthrough symbolized in the first African-American president is due to the courageous Christian behavior of some who have gone before.  I hope that you will read enough someday to know about Abraham Lincoln, Frederick Douglas, Jackie Robinson, Thurgood Marshall, and Martin Luther King, Jr.  Martin Luther King, Jr. Day was yesterday and Obama’s inauguration was today.  If Obama ends up being a terrible president, much of this will come to naught; but I want you to know that today many people rejoiced—not necessarily because they have much hope for Obama—though many are hopeful—but rather people rejoiced because black people have experienced so much grief and heartache in our nation’s history.  Today’s inauguration was one small gesture (and I mean that—small) by which we as a country tell our African-American brothers and sisters, that we—our ancestors, our people, whites—we were wrong.  Not only were black slaves human beings equal to ourselves, not only should people of any color be able to vote, but we as a country—at least a majority of voters—have elected an African-American person to lead our country.  We were wrong.  We were wrong.  We were wrong. 

    I know why I have felt the need to write this letter.  I have read this year the sermons of Peter Storey who pastored in Johannesburg, South Africa from 1976 to 1997.  I am reading Dietrich Bonhoeffer and Karl Barth who resisted Nazism in Germany.  I am also reading about how some intellectuals were apologists for the Nazi regime in Claudia Koonz’s The Nazi Conscience

    But I was most struck by Martin Luther King’s Letter from a Birmingham Jail.  It is a letter to eight pastors who criticized him. The pastors urged blacks to pursue peace by conventional measures “not in the streets.”  History tells us that they were the short-sighted ones.  They chose sides poorly.  They thought that because the protests weren’t perfect, protesting was wrong.  The pastors were wrong.  King was right.    

    The right side of history on the night of Obama’s inauguration seems to me to be: hoping and supporting Obama in being the kind of leader God would want him to be; and to be rejoicing that in one small way America has proclaimed that we were and are wrong when we judge people by the color of their skin.  As I said above, as Christians, we do not trust leaders for the destiny of our country.  But when we see people trying to follow Jesus and the results of those who have tried to follow Jesus, we hope and rejoice.

    My particular vocation is bound up with serving the church.  I want to lead the church to be an alternative community that demonstrates God’s inbreaking reign.  This is my primary way of being on the right side of history.  But when we notice other rays of the light of God’s kingdom breaking in from what seems to be outside the church, these we should also affirm. 

    If twenty years from now, we can see that today was a breakthrough for the fortunes of African-Americans and for a more humble, compassionate America, I want to declare that I was on that side of history. 

    Your dad.

    10:30 pm

    Tuesday, January 20, 2009