Categories
Uncategorized

Eugene Peterson Explains How U2’s Work is Prophetic

Eugene Peterson, author of The Message, and one of my heroes because of his books on pastoring, says U2 has a prophetic voice. We often say that biblical prophets were more about "forthtelling" than "foretelling." Prophets are also poets and a bit rough around the edges. But they tell us what we need to hear. Below I have put some of my favorite quotes from the article. See the full article here.

"Is U2 a prophetic voice? I rather think so. And many of my friends think so. If they do not explicitly proclaim the Kingdom, they certainly prepare the way for that proclamation in much the same way that John the Baptist prepared the way for the kerygma of Jesus…Amos crafted poems, Jeremiah wept sermons, Isaiah alternately rebuked and comforted, Ezekiel did street theater. U2 writes songs and goes on tour, singing them."

U2 doesn’t seem to be calculated in what they are doing. It just comes out of who they are, and maybe that’s why people respond to them, because they are so unconventional in the rock music world. And then there is the social passion they have evidenced in the African world, and the effort that they go to to speak to people of influence in order to try to convince them that pain and suffering and impoverishment are the responsibility of those who are in positions of influence and power — such people are not to just make war and do public relations and win elections and develop strategies to get people to be better consumers.So I’ve used the word prophet for them. Walter Brueggemann describes prophets as uncredentialed spokesmen for God. Well, I think that fits them pretty well. They don’t have any authority in the world of faith.

I think they started out pretty confused and were kind of just messing around. I think they must be as surprised about this — that people like me are calling them prophets — as maybe as I am. But doesn’t that happen a lot? When we’re living with any kind of authenticity, we don’t know what we are doing until, suddenly, moments come of clarification — catalytic moments — and we see suddenly this is what I am, this is what I’m doing. But in the spiritual life, calculation doesn’t work.

I don’t have a whole lot of respect for popular culture — too much of it seems to me to be reductive, escapist, and trivial. But none of those adjectives fit Bono and U2 as far as I know.

There’s something very refreshing about U2. It’s honest music. There’s an honesty and that’s why I think the word prophetic is accurate for them. They are not saying things that people want to hear to make them escape from their ordinary lives. They push us back into the conditions in which we have to live.

Categories
Bible Study

The Best Bible Study Tools on the Web

Updated August 31, 2006

Here are the Best Bible Study Tools I know about on the web. Still_life_with_bible

English Translations:

BibleGateway.com
BibleGateway.com is the best Bible search site.  It has almost all of the best English translations.  You can look at five versions of a passage at a time.  Here are some of the versions I would recommend checking out.  The descriptions below in quotes are from the publishers of the Bibles. 

  • Today’s New International Version (TNIV), 2005. "The Today’s New International Version (TNIV) is a thoroughly accurate, fully trustworthy Bible text built on the rich heritage of the New International Version (NIV). In fact, this contemporary language version incorporates the continuing work of the Committee on Bible Translation (CBT), the translators of the NIV, since the NIV’s last update in 1984."  I really like this translation and would recommend you using it with the ESV.   It is well-known for being more gender-inclusive than the ESV.   
  • English Standard Version (ESV), 2001. "It seeks to be transparent to the original text,   letting the reader see as directly as possible the structure and meaning of   the original."  Very popular in conservative reformed churches. 
  • New International Version (NIV), 1984.  The most popular English translation.  It is very popular with evangelicals.  I am hoping that more and more people begin to notice some of these newer translations. 
  • New American Standard Bible (NASB), 1995.  "The NASB update continues the NASB’s tradition of literal translation of the original Greek and Hebrew without compromise."  It is hard to read but helpful if you want to get word-for-word translation. 
  • Holman Christian Standard Bible (HCSB), 2003. "to affirm the authority of the Scriptures as God’s inerrant word and to champion its absolutes against social or cultural agendas that would compromise its accuracy."  This is another new solid translation. 
  • New Living Translation, second edition, (NLT), 2004. "In the New Living Translation, this is accomplished by translating entire thoughts (rather than just words) into natural, everyday English."  This is another outstanding translation that has been updated since its original 1996 version.  It is more of a paraphrase but done by outstanding scholars. 
  • The Message (MSG), 2002. "There is a need in every generation to keep the language of the gospel message current, fresh, and understandable—the way it was for its very first readers. That is what The Message seeks to accomplish for contemporary readers."  This paraphrase by Eugene Peterson reminds us that the Bible didn’t originally sound holy and religious but rather earthy and fresh. 
  • Contemporary English Version (CEV), 1995. "The text is easily read by grade schoolers, second language readers, and those who prefer the more contemporized form."  These last two translations are superb resources for English as a Second Language and young readers.  Children’s Sunday school teachers must start using these two versions!
  • New International Reader’s Version (NIrV), 1998. "The NIV is easy to understand and very clear. More people read the NIV than any other English Bible. We made the NIrV even easier to read and understand. Sometimes we used shorter words. We explained words that might be hard to understand. We made the sentences shorter."  This should be the first choice for all who work with children or in ESL.

The New Revised Standard Version (NRSV), 1989. It is typically used in Presbyterian USA churches among other places.  The NRSV is the one recent version that is not yet on Biblegateway.com but you can find it at:

NRSV

Commentary lists:

Ever wondered which commentaries, you should grab off the library shelf.  Well check out the recommend lists below.   
Gordon-Conwell Bibliography – Christian Resources
Denver Seminary Journal – 60101 – Annotated Old Testament Bibliography
Denver Seminary Journal – 60201 – New Testament Bibliography

I also recommend pointing students to the list at the end of the book of:

Fee, Gordon and Douglas Stuart. How to Read the Bible for All Its Worth. 3d ed. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2003.

This is a much more comprehensive resource:

Glynn, John. Commentary and Reference Survey: A Comprehensive Guide to Biblical and Theological Resources. 9th. ed. Kregel Academic & Professional, 2003.  It was reviewed positively in RBL and JETS  A new version is coming out in March 2007. 

Commentaries:
BibleGateway.com Commentaries
IVP NT Commentaries – not bad for free.  Thanks InterVarsity. 

Classic Bible Commentaries (Luther, Calvin, Wesley, Spurgeon)

Plea to commentary writers and publishers:

There are so many outstanding commentaries that are written and published.  I am waiting for some publisher or author to make their commentaries available online for free. It would do a tremendous amount of good to widely circulate solid biblical commentaries.  Too many people use the ancient Matthew Henry Commentary (1811!) because it is the only thing available online for free.   Don’t commentary writers want their works to be read and used?  I realize they work like crazy on these things and want some compensation and that commentaries are the best money-makers for publishers . . . but still . . . I will say it again . . . don’t they want their works to be read and used?!  What about those of F.F. Bruce for a start?  Gordon Fee and James Dunn, will you put it in your will that all your works be published online for free when you’re gone?  Why wait? 

Bible Software:

For the record, I recommend one of the better Bible software packages as opposed to cobbling together free stuff from the internet. The better Bible softward packages include: Logos (what I have which is ok), Accordance (which Rikk Watts and Phil Long – Regent College professors have), BibleWorks, or Gramcord (D.A. Carson president).

Greek
New Testament Greek
Greek New Testament, Read by Marilyn Phemister
Greek-Latin New Testament Audio Readings
http://www.zhubert.com

Photos for Use in PowerPoint
Holy Land Photos
Free for use by professors and students

BiblePlaces.com – Photos of Israel from the Pictorial Library of Bible Lands
Sells Bible Places photos but lets students use the ones on the websites for free.

Audio

See also my list of the very best audio lectures and sermons on the web here.

Categories
Preaching

Sermon Audio Reports: Wangerin, McLaren, Buechner, Capon, Foster, Groome

I have been listening to more sermon audio. See a list of lectures and sermons available at my earlier posting here.

Probably the biggest delight was a sermon by Walter Wangerin on The Manger is Empty. It is interspersed with music by Ken Medema. I will give away the final line since you will probably not listen to it. Like the babydoll Jesus in the manger in a Christmas play represents the exalted Christ, so the body in the coffin at a funeral represents a deeper reality. Great story – worth listening to – even though it isn’t Christmas-time. (Wangerin has written my favorite book on marriage As For Me and My House).

It was interesting to hear more about how Brian McLaren started Cedar Ridge Community Church. He reminisces about this and other things in his "Road Ahead" swan song series from January 2006. He is stepping down as Senior Pastor at the end of the month. They have a new pastor, Matthew Dyer, coming from the UK (I believe). McLaren talks about how he attended an Episcopal church in the early 1980’s and had a booming small group (60 people) studying the Bible – some Christians and some not. He had hoped to start a church in cooperation with the church he was attending but because it was across the river, it was in a different diocese. For this and other reasons, it didn’t work out to do with them so he branched off independently.

He remembers most fondly meeting with the one other elder in the church in the early days for breakfast at Denny’s and then going and praying in one of their cars afteward. McLaren uses Paul’s farewell speech to the Ephesian elders as the basis for his comments. What I like about McLaren is his pastoral ability to say things in everyday language with the right sensitivity. (He does not do this in his fiction because he is trying to be thought-provoking.) His ten commandments on how to treat the next pastor are brilliant.

I also found a site with lots more sermon audio. There I listened to two short reflections by esteemed author Frederick Buechner. In "A Moment of Grace" Buechner reflects on an experience he had with Maya Angelou. Angelou commented that despite the obvious fact that she is an African-American woman and he is a Caucasian male, her story and Buechner’s "are the same story." Angelou then relates an incident of racism where a man calls some white soldiers "our boys." Buechner asks if the reconciliation that later occurs might be paradigmatic for churches today. Why not admit our sin and then be reconciled to one another? In the second reflection, Buechner tells a story about his alchololic father (who later committed suicide) and then reflects how someone told him: "you were a good steward of your pain." Buechner talks about other ways of dealing with pain such as ignoring it but explains that our pain can be the source of our greatest passion and gifts to the world. I thought Buechner’s voice and style sounded a bit like Larry Crabb – who I like to listen to.

I read a short article from a Oct 8, 1990 Christianity Today about Buechner which I thought was an excellent introduction to his thought and life. Earlier today, I was reaffirming to myself the need to tell stories when we communicate. I loved this section from the CT article on Buechner’s understanding of preaching and will remember especially his words in red below.

Buechner’s concern to communicate theological truth with careful nuance and "eye-catching" style represents more than an artisan’s pride in his work. He bemoans much contemporary Christian preaching and writing as anemic in style, lacking passion and color. Telling the Truth: The Gospel as Tragedy, Comedy, and Fairy Tale (1977), the published version of his Lyman Beecher Lectures at Yale on preaching, stresses again and again, "The news of the Gospel is that extraordinary things happen."
"If you’re a theologian writing a sytematic theology," Buechner says, "perhaps you don’t need to worry so much about being creative and imaginative with the words; you’re mainly interested in clarity. But if you are preaching or doing apologetics, it’s crucial to do it as vividly and passionately as you can manage. If you want what you’re writing about to come alive, you’ve got to know what it looks like and smells like and feels like. The magic of words is that they have power to do more than convey meaning; not only do they have the power to make things clear, they make things happen."

I so appreciate Buechner’s perspective here. I think so much preaching is indeed "anemic in style, lacking passion and color" and in general I like Buechner’s solution. The only thing I would add is the need to be deeply rooted in the Scriptures.

I was glad to see that he had a positive experience at Wheaton College. I have a friend, John Noble, doing his Ph.D. in Old Testament at Harvard University so I was considering applying to Harvard Divinity School for my Th.D. Plus, I have so enjoyed publications from Harvard Business School. But I decided against it for various reasons. It is interesting to see that even the non-evangelical Buechner was caught off guard by the atheist(s) in his classes when he taught there.

Today I also heard Maya Angelou giving her reflections on the death of Coretta Scott King on the One Hour Special on NPR. She wanted to clarify that Martin was never intent on divorcing Coretta as at least one biography has insinuated. She reminisced about late night chats with her friend Coretta. This article says that she attends three churches: one in San Francisco, one in DC and one in her hometown. Her poem "Christian" is excellent – explaining that saying she is a Christian is not because she is perfect but because she is needy.

I also listened to a quick sermon on the Prodigal Son in Luke 15 by Robert Farrar Capon. Andy Crouch, (Christianity Today writer who my students and I just met with in January) and Loren Wilkinson (one of my professors at Regent College) have highly recommended Capon. Andy and Loren’s lives reflect the importance of meals, simplicity, rejection of extraneous technology and fellowship. The unique insight from Capon’s exegesis is that he suggests that the older brother already owned the farm and the fatted calf. I think that could be the case but I’m not convinced. It seems in the story that the father is still quite in charge even if he has given away 1/2 of his inheritance to the younger brother. I doubt he has given the other 1/2 to the older brother yet. That though is a cultural issue that perhaps a good New Testament scholar could uncover for us. I would need to look it up in the Luke commentaries (Bock, Bovon, Evans, Fitzmyer, Green, Marshall) for a start or Craig Keener’s IVP Bible Background Commentary: New Testament.

I also listened to a short sermon by Richard Foster of Celebration of Discipline fame. He suggested from 1 John 3:20 that there may be things that we condemn ourselves for that God does not condemn us for. We may feel bad because we are fat or made a bad business decision but God does not condemn us.

1 John 3:20 TNIV
20 If our hearts condemn us, we know that God is greater than our hearts, and he knows everything.

I think Foster is right in that surely God does not condemn us for those things he mentioned but I’m not sure if that is what this text is about. Foster acknowledges that the more obvious explanation is that John is here reassuring his readers that "there is nothing you have done that God isn’t big enough to forgive" (my paraphrase). I think this is most likely interpretation but again I would be interested in seeing what the commentaries (Brown, Marshall, Smalley, Akin, Burge, Kruse, Meye Thompson, Stott) say.

I also listened to a retelling of the story of Jairus by Thomas Groome. I use Groome’s Christian Religious Education and Sharing Faith as textbooks in my teaching and curriculum classes. Groome, a Catholic professor at Boston College, retells the story in first person which is actually quite engaging. Groome is known for his very dense prose.

I also listened to a sermon by Will Willimon (the pastor to pastors, former Duke chaplain, and now a bishop) but my baby was crying so I didn’t get as much out of it. I plan on listening again to a meaty lecture by Yale theologian and acclaimed author Miroslav Volf on "Kingdom and Calling."