Author: Andy Rowell

  • Review of Coffeehouse Theology by Ed Cyzewski

    Ed Cyzewski, Coffeehouse Theology: Reflecting on God in Everyday Life.  Colorado Springs, CO: NavPress, 2008.  233 pp. $10.19 (paper), ISBN: 978-1600062773. 

    29-year old Ed Cyzewski explains how his theological perspective has deepened and strengthened in the process of his theological education.  Cyzewski is a teacher–wanting to put his discoveries in language college students or other people beginning to be interested in theology can understand.  He earnestly shares personal stories and contemporary examples to illustrate the theological concepts he is trying to explain.  In his famous/infamous book A New Kind of Christian, Brian McLaren provocatively presents conversations between fictional characters on a number of controversial theological topics.  Cyzewski addresses many of these questions but shows how he has resolved them in his own mind.  If you were confused by McLaren's questions, Cyzewski helps sketch how an evangelical Christian might move toward resolution.  Maybe McLaren's A New Kind of Christian and Cyzewski's Coffeehouse Theology should be given to all Christian college students–the former to get them intrigued about theology and the latter to nudge them toward further constructive reflection.  Cyzewski's book is ambitious–tackling a number of issues related to systematic theology.  Perhaps one might want to read a more distinguished theologian who addresses these issues–perhaps Lesslie Newbigin or Stan Grenz; but academic theologians rarely address so many contemporary questions in such a concise way and in language as accessible as Cyzewski's.  One of the great parts of Coffeehouse Theology is that Cyzewski recommends many other books as he moves through the book–purposefully trying to intrigue the reader to explore further. 

    One minor critique of Cyzewski's book is his regular use of the term "contextual theology" to describe his approach.  He writes, "So we need to challenge ourselves to learn about God with an awareness of context–what we can call 'contextual theology'–while at the same time making sure we value different insights from different cultures where Christians are learning about God in their own particular situations.  In brief, that's where we are headed together in this book.  Coffeehouse Theology will help us understand who we are and by including perspectives outsider of our own in the midst of our study of Scripture" (20).  What Cyzewski actually means by the term "contexual theology" is "good theology" or just plain "theology."  Cyzewski does not intend to align himself with the "contextual theologies" that typically fall under that heading.  For example, Lesslie Newbigin characterizes "contexual theology" in a negative way as "a theology that gives primary attention to the issues that people are facing at that time and place and insists that the gospel cannot be communicated except in terms of these issues" (Lesslie Newbigin, The Open Secret: An Introduction to the Theology of Mission, rev. ed; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1995, 133-134).  Andrew Walls calls “contextualized” “appalling jargon” (Andrew F. Walls, The Missionary Movement in Christian History: Studies in the Transmission of Faith, Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 1996, 7, 84).  David Bosch writes, "It goes without saying that not every manifestation of contextual theology is guilty of any or all of the overreactions discussed above.  Still, they all remain a constant danger to every (legitimate!) attempt at allowing the context to determine the nature and content of theology for that context" (David J. Bosch, Transforming Mission: Paradigm Shifts in Theology of Mission (Maryknoll, N.Y.: Orbis Books, 1991), 432, Cf. 420-432.   Darrell Guder's Missional Church uses the term "contexualization" but not "contextual theology." "The church relates constantly and dynamically both to the gospel and to its contextual reality.  It is important, then for the church to study its context carefully and to understand it.  The technical term for this continuing discipline is contextualization" (Darrell Guder, ed. The Missional Church: A Vision for the Sending of the Church in North America, Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998, 18).  Again, I do not think Cyzewski's approach has the weaknesses of the group of theologies under the heading "contextual theologies" but I do think it is unfortunate he repeatedly uses that term to describe his own approach.    

    All in all, Cyzewski's Coffeehouse Theology is a fine introduction to a number of contemporary issues in theology in language college students or other beginning theological students will understand.  I hope it will serve as the on-ramp for many into rigorous theological reflection.   

    Resources:

    Sample Chapter

    Post on Emergent Village blog: Why I wrote yet another book on contextual theology …

    Ed Cyzewski's Blog: In a Mirror Dimly.

    Ed Cyzewski's Website.

    Note:

    Ed Cyzewski is a Taylor University grad like I am. 

    See my post:

    Everything I needed to know about the church I learned at Taylor University.

  • A wider target: Deconstructing and redeploying the Seeker Sensitive Service planning of The Purpose Driven Church

    In 1995, Rick Warren published The Purpose Driven Church.  It was perhaps the most influential book in church circles in the decade.  It was the definitive "how-to" manual of how grow a megachurch.  In it, he presented Donald McGavran's "Church Growth" principles from the 1970's to a new generation.  Younger leaders in their 30's like Leadership Journal managing editor Skye Jethani and myself continue to feel like these ideas need further theological reflection.   In his post in January 2008 entitled Sense & Sensitivity: Why It’s Time to Abandon the Seeker-Sensitive Model, Skye reflects on biblical and monastic hospitality and urges churches to embrace people first rather than focusing on which people our church is targeting.  Although I largely agree with Skye, I want to affirm in the seeker sensitive approach the principle of intentionality.  I think it makes sense to be intentional about how we are communicating in our worship services but I agree with Skye that a narrow target is theologically problematic. 

    What we need I believe is a wider target.  The educational and missional and liturgical task demand that we attempt to communicate as clearly as we can with as many people in attendance as possible.  For those not involved in this ideological argument between seeker-senstive vs. not seeker-sensitive, this should be quite obvious.  In plain English, the pastor and worship leaders should attempt to draw in and engage as many people who may attend the church from the surrounding community as possible.  This is the wide target.  This involves speaking clearly, using music that has broad appeal, and using images that are accessible to a large range of people.  This is why the tasks of preaching and leading worship are so difficult.  However, this seemingly obvious insight does have some edge to it, some "bite," because it means that congregational worship and preaching that only appeals to the most entrenched insiders needs to be given greater accessibility.  The pastor can address very complex Christian concepts and stories but they need to use vocabulary that people readily understand (or they need to define those theological words).  Rituals need to explained.  Music needs to be singable or otherwise accessible or it needs to be carefully taught.  What Warren and other seeker-sensitive people get is that the person who visits the church for the first time needs to be given tips and help on making sense of what is going on.  This, as I argue below, however does not mean that churches need to only have one target audience.  They need to be intentional about communicating with the wider target of their surrounding community.   

    Here then is my comment on Skye's blog in response to his post

    I think this theological probing into hospitality is important work.  I agree with you that the biggest problem with seeker-sensitive approaches is that they seek to capitalize on people's social prejudices by giving them an environment, communication and music that makes them feel comfortable.  This can tend to reinforce social barriers.  If the worship service is designed to appeal to "Saddleback Sam . . . in his late thirties or early forties . . . among the most affluent of Americans" (Rick Warren, The Purpose Driven Church, Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1995, p. 169-170), then one wonders whether people who do not fit this profile will feel that they do not belong. 

    As one attempts to speak the language of the people; (I like this terminology because it makes one think of the missionary task or educational task); we must be careful to include the whole surrounding community–a wider target.  Warren and others are wrong I think for championing the targeting of one demographic (Saddleback Sam), but they are right in wanting to clearly communicate the gospel of Jesus to those present in language those people understand.  "Why do we got to all this trouble defining the typical person we're trying to reach?  Because the more you understand someone the easier it is to communicate with him" (Warren, Purpose Driven Church, 171).  Yes, that we can agree with.  Warren contradicts his own emphasis on Saddleback Sam when he notes in passing that his church has not rigidly followed the single-demographic targeting!   He notes, "One of the advantages of being a large church is that you have the resources to go after multiple targets . . . we've been able to add additional ministries and outreach programs to reach young adults, single adults, prisoners, the elderly, parents with ADD children, and Spanish-, Vietnamese-, and Korean-speaking people, as well as many other targets" (Warren, Purpose Driven Church, 159-160).  Warren's conscience, even in 1995 before his awakening to the needs to the world, would not allow him to strictly only target one group's needs.  But he is wrong that only large churches have the luxury of reaching a variety of people.  No, every church needs to intentionally communicate with (and minister to) the broad range of people who live within their community.         

    Therefore, I do not think that it is mutually exclusive to "welcome strangers indiscriminately into our tent/monastery/church" and "determine our target audience’s desires in advance."  Preparing for people to come over is precisely what hospitable people do.  The monastery has clean beds and food in the cupboards so that when the stranger shows up, they can be hosted appropriately.  Similarly, it is appropriate for churches to prepare well to communicate with the people who will come through the doors.

    Furthermore, negligence by worship leaders and preachers in preparing well to communicate in language that guests understand will not necessarily lead to congregation members stepping up and being more hospitable.  I have seen friendly and distant congregation members at both seeker megachurches and traditional small churches but my sense is that the pastor and worship leaders have a significant role in shaping congregational practice by their own example and practice.       

    See also my posts

    Strengths of the Purpose Driven Church and Sober Advice For Those Considering the Megachurch

    Why pastors should be both goal-setting fanatics and cynics

  • Advice on applying for a pastoral position

    I received an email from a man in his 40's who is interested in a pastoral position at a church of 85 attendance.  He has done a lot of leadership in Christian organizations but hasn't been a pastor.  Here is my quick response to him this morning.  I did not post his letter to me but in my response I work through the main questions he asked me: (1) approaching the process, (2) salary, and (3) church growth.  He wanted me to post my response in case it might help others.

    Dear __________,

    First of all, I would not share with the congregational search
    committee about the setbacks or problems in the churches and parachurch organizations you served
    unless you are talking about how you positively addressed the
    situation.  Emphasize ways you contributed that turned out well.  "I
    noticed this . . . this problem came up . . . and this how I addressed
    it."  That shows them how you would address problems.  If you talk
    about "the whole story" about the decline of the organizations you were
    involved in, that will be discouraging for all and is unnecessary.  I
    just don't think the details of all those situations matter to the
    congregation and I think they unnecessarily muddy the waters as this
    church is different from those past organizations.  I have attached two
    resumes (one of me and one of my wife) we did a while back.  It
    demonstrates a bit of how we highlight things we accomplished.  You
    also want to do this in interviews.  You want to focus on positive
    accomplishments.  When they ask you a question, say, "Well here is how
    I addressed something like that in the past . . . " 

    Most churches are looking for a good preacher and someone with
    integrity.  Perhaps you have a tape of a good sermon you've preached or
    you can do a great one when they ask you to come interview
    ("candidate"). 

    Hopefully you also have a lot of people in your past
    who can speak to your integrity, honesty, hard work, and
    compassion–usually three good references–ideally people who were
    colleagues or in official positions in the church or parachurch
    organizations you were involved in but you can have someone who was a
    volunteer leader. 

    They want to know that you are a good listener and care about
    people (like elderly people) and can speak to them with interest,
    laugh, ask questions and empathize.       

    My How to Search for a Christian Ministry Job which I wrote for graduating Christian ministry majors in 2006 might also be helpful as far as the job search.  

    I think the Presbyterians are right in talking about the
    pastor hearing a call to the church (feeling like it is a good fit) and
    the congregation hearing a call to the pastor (this is the right person
    God has for us now).  The process should be thought of as "discerning
    the call"–not "hiring" and "finding a job."  This is your prayer,
    "God, help this to be a good match for both the congregation and our
    family." 

    Second, on salary, sometimes pastors salaries are thought to be
    similar to teacher's salaries in the area.  Perhaps that is a place to
    start.  There are a few surveys out there like the LifeWay Compensation Study: 2008 Southern Baptist Convention Compensation Study.  I don't think you shared what state you are in but I did a calculation for Senior Pastors in Missiouri (a good swing state!) attendance 75-99.  Average compensation: $33,856.  Average pay package: $41,232. 

    Do not mention salary until the very end when they have offered you
    the job and present to you what their offer is.  Of course, don't say
    "yes" until you have heard what the package is.  My hope is that with
    home prices as high as you mention, they will pay you ok.  Churches
    will want to make sure that they are paying you a fair salary.  My bet
    is that it will be in the ballpark of these averages mentioned above. 
    You should be thrilled if they are 10K higher.  If they are lower, you
    are welcome to say, given my three kids and the cost of living in this
    area, and what is typically paid to pastors of other low-paying
    denominations like the Southern Baptist Convention in this state, I was
    thinking $__________.  If they like you, they won't let you go over a
    difference of 5-8K; they will cough up the money.  But if you mention it
    early, they will think you are all about money and no one likes that. 

    Third and last, as far as vision-casting and church growth, I would be slow about
    that as I mention in the my post you read: 8 pieces of advice for a new pastor.  Your main jobs will be adequately
    preaching and leading worship and getting to know everyone's name and
    the stories of the congregation in the past.  Eventually you will be
    able to identify the key leaders in the congregation (perhaps 15) and
    have casual and then gradually more focused conversations about focus
    and direction.  In general though you should not expect much major
    change for 5 years!  If you are doing great preaching, you will be able
    to stay around 75-85 attendance and at least pay to heat the building, a 15 hours
    per week church secretary, 10 hours of janitorial service, and your
    salary.  I like David Hansen's book The Art of Pastoring for encouragement about small congregations and getting by.       

    May the Lord strengthen and guide you as you seek to serve the church. 

    Grace and peace,

    andy


    Andy Rowell
    Th.D. Student
    Duke Divinity School
    Durham, North Carolina
    Blog: www.andyrowell.net