Categories
Ecclesiology John Howard Yoder Taylor University

Everything I needed to know about the church I learned at Taylor University.

Last weekend, I missed my ten year reunion at Taylor University.  The following article is published in the Fall 2008 issue of Metanoia, an admissions publication for Taylor.  In the article, I reflect that when I was a student at Taylor I grew familiar with the practices theologian John Howard Yoder argues in Body Politics are key to church health.    

Notes:
Taylor has about 1800 students and was named the #1 Baccalaureate College (Midwest) in this year's US News and World Report Best Colleges.  My wife Amy and I returned to teach Christian Educational Ministries at Taylor for the 2005-2006, and 2006-2007 school years.

I recommended Yoder's Body Politics at my post: Best book on ecclesiology I read this year.

I recently also recommended a book for people interested in ministering to college students: Outstanding book about college students; Book Review: I Once Was Lost by Everts and Schaupp

I also recently reviewed the new book Coffeehouse Theology by Taylor graduate Ed Cyzewski

Having written this a few months ago, my question today is: How do we help adults to experience community if they have never had experiences of community when they were younger?  I reflect on the classroom aspect of this in the post  Education in the Local Church: Taylor, Willimon, Storey, Niebuhr, and Groome  but certainly there is much more to this topic.

I have written a 100 page paper on John Howard Yoder's Missional Ecclesiology.  I will post it sometime.


Full article:

Pastor and theology professor declares: “Everything I needed to know about the church I learned at Taylor.”

By Andy Rowell

July 10, 2008

Sidebar:

The six most important things you need to know about Christian community that you learn at Taylor:

1. It is not good for a person to be alone.

2. Small groups for Bible study and prayer are a good thing.

3. Worship should include hugs, fun, challenge to the mind, and passionate expression.

4. Meals should be eaten with friends and include good conversation.

5. Life in Christian community involves regular conflict resolution.

6. Service is worth doing.

Main article:

I have been doing quite a bit of research and writing on the practices of the church for my Doctor of Theology (Th.D.) coursework at Duke University Divinity School this year. Before coming to Duke, my wife Amy and I were Visiting Instructors of Christian Educational Ministries for two years at Taylor. We are both Taylor graduates (1998). In the process of doing my research, I have really enjoyed the work of Mennonite theologian John Howard Yoder (1927-1997). In his little 80-page book Body Politics: Five Practices of the Christian Community Before the Watching World (1992), Yoder describes five important practices of the early church. He suggests that they have a great impact on the world when they are practiced by the church. I noticed that my formation in many of these practices had come through my experience as a student at Taylor. Meanwhile, I have met various Taylor alumni during our time in Vancouver, British Columbia and now here in North Carolina. I regularly notice in these people a deep love for Christian community.

My hypothesis is that Taylor University alumni have a hunger for Christian community. They have tasted it at Taylor and their stomachs grumble until they find it in their post-Taylor lives. Taylor students get a taste of all five of the practices that John Howard Yoder suggests are critical to the functioning of the Christian community. Because of how they have been formed at Taylor, Taylor alumni tend to be outstanding participants in their churches.

I believe Taylor University instills six principles of Christian community life in its students that prepare them for later service in the local church.

First, Taylor students learn that it is not good for a person to be alone. At Taylor, all freshmen and sophomores live on campus. Most juniors and seniors do too. Usually, if they live off-campus, they do so because they want the opportunity to form a different kind of community. I think of the hospitable community of curry-cooking missionary kids and international students who inhabited the Soup House when I was at Taylor. There are not many living arrangements at Taylor that allow a person to isolate themselves. Typically, students share bathrooms with one another. Sometimes you keep quiet to allow others to get studying done. At other times, the people nearby function as your ever-ready means for a study break. In this enforced immersion into close-living quarters, you learn that life is better when lived in close proximity to other human beings.

When I was a student at Taylor, there was someone at the end of the hall on my floor who watched a lot of television and played a lot of video games by himself. We found out later he was clinically depressed. A number of us sensed that there was something wrong. We would knock on his door, strike up conversations with him, invite him to do go to dinner with us, and include him in our activities. This love, and that is what it was, made a difference in his life. His habits began to change from instinctively flipping on the TV and flopping on the couch to peeking in our rooms to see what we were up to. His life changed. He ended up organizing in 1995 the first Tonight We Ride (motorcycle themed open house) on Second West Wengatz. As a professor, I visited the 2007 version.

Today at Taylor the critique of technology isolation is organized on some floors as a voluntary week-long “technology fast” from video games and TV. The Taylor culture instills the truth that activities with others (taking walks, playing Frisbee, jamming on musical instruments, pick-up basketball, intramurals, taking road trips, and lip-syncing) are better than sitting in front of the TV. You learn that doing something social in a mixed group of women and men (i.e. “pick-a-dates”) is fun regardless of who someone on your floor set you up with.

John Howard Yoder urges churches to recover the value of every person in the congregation, “The Fullness of Christ.” The apostle Paul wrote “The eye cannot say to the hand, ‘I don't need you!’ And the head cannot say to the feet, ‘I don't need you!’ . . . God has put the body together” (1 Corinthians 12:21, 24). Taylor alumni get the fact that Christian community is about investing in people. Taylor alumni, I suggest, (with no empirical evidence to support it), are more likely to resist isolating technology, initiate social activities, and pursue relationships than other people. They are less likely to believe that wealth, gadgets and fame are the key to happiness.

Second, Taylor students learn that small groups for Bible study and prayer are a good thing. When I was at Taylor I participated in wing small groups, Senior-Freshmen small groups, Christian Educational Ministry small groups, and Baseball team small groups – sometimes having three different meetings per week. Each year in the fall there was some pressure by the PA’s and Discipleship Assistant on the wing to get involved in a wing small group. “Come on. Sign up. It is good for you. Dude, are you going to be in a small group? Be in mine.” In practice, some people decided to be in other small groups than the wing small groups. Others signed up but rarely made it because “it is a busy week.” Others just said, “No, that’s not my thing.” But at least there was some expectation that small groups should be the normal practice of growing Christians.

In this way, almost every Taylor student had both good and not-so-good small group experiences. They had experience in rich, engaging, fascinating, challenging, and caring groups. And they had experience in boring and legalistic ones.

Excellent small groups correspond closely to what Yoder calls “The Rule of Paul,” – the procedure outlined by Paul in 1 Corinthians 14. Everyone should have the opportunity to share. Speech that improves, encourages and consoles, called by Paul “prophecy,” should be given priority. The other members of the group should “weigh” what has been said.

Having been involved in small groups at Taylor, alumni understand the beauty, care and insight of small groups. They understand what Paul was talking about in 1 Corinthians 14. Upon graduating, most students have spent more time in small groups than much older people. No wonder so many Taylor grads end up as small group leaders in their churches.

Third, Taylor students learn that worship should include hugs, fun, challenge to the mind, and passionate expression. At Taylor, worship in chapel is voluntary (though expected). Because there is no taking attendance, there is a feeling that the people in the chapel on a given day have chosen to be here. They have come because they want to worship. They want to learn. They want to be part of this community.

Students sit with their friends and when they arrive, they give each other hugs, hand slaps, fist-pounds, and pats on the back. They rowdily cheer when the president is introduced to speak. They jokingly boo when other schools are mentioned from the podium and jokingly cheer when their dorm is mentioned. They sing loud. They expect speakers to challenge them and inspire them from the Scriptures.

Yoder says that the early church participants were bonded together as a family. Other loyalties and obligations related to social class and race were diminished because of their common connection to Jesus. He calls this “Baptism and the New Humanity” citing Galatians 3:27-28, “for all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, neither male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.” It is this joy that Taylor alumni bring with them when they seek to make their church communities places of warmth and welcome. They warmly welcome new people and embrace old friends. They celebrate great music. They are strong supporters of their pastors who they expect will challenge and inspire them from the Scriptures.

Fourth, Taylor students learn that meals should be eaten with friends and include good conversation. At Taylor, eating is an event. You don’t just grab a sandwich in your room. If you eat, you go to the Dining Commons. This involves a hike there for that purpose. And since it is a project, an outing, you do it with others. You make the trek over from your dorm, go through the line and find a place to sit. In the process, you invite people who look to be alone if they want to grab a seat with your group. If you’re alone, you look for a familiar face and gesture and learn to courageously say, “Can I eat with you guys?” to which the answer is almost invariably “yes” unless the meal has been planned as a special meeting or study session. Furthermore, Taylor students get accustomed to booking meals with people they look forward to conversing with. “I can’t talk now because I have got to run to class. But can you do lunch on Thursday? What about Monday dinner?”

Day after day, week after week, of meals with friends, builds the habit that meals with others is what happy people do. Sure, every once in a while, you get stuck eating alone, with not a familiar face in sight. But this is the unfortunate exception which instills in you the determination to be more intentional and strategic in the future. It is no wonder then that Taylor graduates are the people who say to others after church – “hey, do you all have lunch plans? Anyone want to run to Panera?” Or, hey, “I can’t talk today. We’ve got to get our kids home for naps. But do you want to do coffee sometime? Or maybe you all can come over Friday night for dinner. ”

Yoder writes that another practice of the early church is that “Disciples Break Bread Together.” Yoder points out that what we call today “Communion” or “Eucharist” or “Lord’s Supper” was surely a meal in the early church. Though this subject has a complicated history with debates between Catholics and Protestants about the meaning of this practice, it is can at least be acknowledged that eating together, then and now, is most often done with family. Sharing a table is one way of opening up our lives to others. From hundreds of significant conversations at meal time over four years, Taylor alumni understand that God works when we sit and eat with other people.

Fifth, Taylor students learn that life in Christian community involves regular conflict resolution. In Taylor’s “Life Together Covenant” Matthew 18:15-18 is suggested as the model confrontation procedure. John Howard Yoder calls this “Binding and Loosing” (Matthew 18:18). If you have a problem with what someone else has done, you are supposed to talk to them about it. If you are unsatisfied with how this conversation goes, you are to enlist the help of someone else to help you two see if you can come to a mutual understanding of the issue. For example, PA’s and Discipleship Assistants in men’s dorms are often involved in conversations trying to keep pranks from spiraling down from fun into revenge. When I was at Taylor, we jokingly called the Matthew 18 confrontation process “care-fronting,” as in, “if he does not quit playing that music loud, there may be the need to care-front him about it.” To put it in biblical terms, Taylor students are familiar with the delicate task of “speaking the truth in love” (Ephesians 4:15).

I don’t think we can underestimate the collective expectation that even in Christian community conflict resolution will be necessary and regular. Taylor alumni do not leave a church the minute someone hurts their feelings or does something different than the way they would do it. There is no false ideal that Christian community is perfect. They assume there will be conflict within even great, healthy Christian communities.

Sixth, Taylor students learn that service is worth doing. There is the expectation at Taylor that you will give of your time and money to serve others. You are challenged to give money to fight AIDS in Africa, to spend time with teens in Hartford City and Marion, to travel overseas on Lighthouse and Spring Break trips to show people God’s love.

Taylor graduates do not need to be taught by their churches that it is important to be generous with their financial resources – even as recent college graduates. Taylor grads expect to find ministries in their church to get involved in. They know that they can’t be involved in everything because they experienced the flood of opportunities to serve at Taylor, but they expect to serve in an area that fits their interests and abilities.

In addition to the five practices name above, Yoder urges Christians to be characterized by holy living and witness. There is among Taylor graduates the understanding that we are to be eager to serve. The common Taylor phrase, “servant leader” gets at this idea.

Taylor University, though not a church, has the potential to prepare students for the very things John Howard Yoder says are key to the thriving of local church life. This has been my experience. I hope it is of many others as well.

Andy Rowell is a Doctor of Theology (Th.D.) student at Duke Divinity School in Durham, North Carolina. His areas of concentration are "The Practice of Leading Christian Communities and Institutions" and "New Testament." Andy grew up in Wheaton, Illinois and received his BA at Taylor University in Upland, Indiana triple-majoring in Christian Educational Ministries, Biblical Studies and Spanish. He graduated with his M.Div. from Regent College in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. He served as an Associate Pastor at Granville Chapel in Vancouver from 1999-2005. From 2005-2007, he served as a professor of Christian Educational Ministries and Biblical Studies at Taylor University in Upland, Indiana. Andy blogs at Church Leadership Conversations (www.andyrowell.net). Andy is married to Amy Rowell, Director of Children's Ministry at Blacknall Presbyterian Church in Durham. Andy and Amy have two sons Ryan and Jacob.

Categories
Dietrich Bonhoeffer Ecclesiology Sociology

Ecclesiology Dissertations: Volf and Bonhoeffer on thinking theologically about the church

Miroslav Volf’s book After Our Likeness: The Church as the Image of the Trinity (originally published in German in 1996) was “a dissertation required for a postdoctoral degree” (p. xi) and Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s book Sanctorum Communio was his doctoral dissertation that was submitted in 1927. 

In the quotes below, both note a surge of interest in the church and both insist on the importance of better theological reflection on the church. 

With seminar papers under my belt on Rowan Williams, John Howard Yoder, the New Testament witness, Matthew 18 and 1 Corinthians, David Bosch, Lesslie Newbigin and Bonhoeffer; and now Volf, Gregory the Great, and sociology of congregations; I am building conversation partners; but I will never touch the erudition of Volf and Bonhoeffer. 

Volf:
Without an ecumenical agreement of what the church is, one can either allow the diverging understandings of office to stand unreconciled next to one another, or one can try to cloak them with merely verbal convergences.  Either way, unity is feigned rather than genuinely attained.  This is why in recent years the question of the character of the church, especially of the understanding of the church as communion, has moved into the center of ecumenical dialogue.  Reflection on the ecclesial structures obviously presupposes reflection on the church.  If the structures of the church really are to be the structures of the church rather than structures over the church, then the church must take precedence over the structures.  (p. 222).

After Our Likeness: The Church As the Image of the Trinity (Sacra Doctrina) by Miroslav Volf (Paperback – Oct 30, 1997)

Bonhoeffer:
In this study social philosophy and sociology are employed in the service of theology.  Only through such an approach, it appears, can we gain a systematic understanding of the community-structure of the Christian church.  This work belongs not to the discipline of sociology of religion, but to theology.  The issue of a Christian social philosophy and sociology is a genuinely theological one, because it can be answered only on the basis of an understanding of the church. (p. 21) . . . To be sure, there rarely has been as much talk about community and church as in the last few years.  Yet it seems to me that such thinking has lacked the thoroughness of theological reflection (p. 23) 

Sanctorum Communio: A Theological Study of the Sociology of the Church (Dietrich Bonhoeffer Works) by Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Clifford J. Green, and Nancy Lukens (Hardcover – Nov 1998)

Categories
Ecclesiology Teaching

Education in the Local Church: Taylor, Willimon, Storey, Niebuhr, and Groome

A number of churches are doing weeknight adult Christian education courses this fall for the first time in a long time. Classes@Willow at Willow Creek Community Church (which you can watch or listen to online), The Midweek Experience – Journey Bible Classes at Granger Community Church, and my own TableTalk at Blacknall Memorial Presbyterian Church.  I am teaching Philippians with Duke New Testament Ph.D. student Tim Wardle. 

I have come across in my reading this week four theologian-pastors talking about education in the church.  I have reproduced those quotes below as they raise almost all of the important issues related to the educational task.  

In summary, Barbara Brown Taylor worries that too often Bible classes do not sufficiently explore what we learn about God from the text and the imagination is too often left unengaged. Will Willimon stresses the importance of pastors instilling the depth of Christian faith in congregations so that they can live despite the unChristian onslaught of the world’s messages. Peter Storey’s comments are similar to Willimon in stating the crucial nature of education for faithful living. Reinhold Neibuhr’s journal reveals his frustrations with students not understanding his theological ruminations.  He later learns to ask more questions and not talk so much. Finally, I note that Thomas Groome’s teaching process–which encourages teachers to start with real life, move to the content, and then move back to life and response–takes into account these various issues.  I hope this will be helpful to any thinking through education in their local church today.  

Four quotations

  • Barbara Brown Taylor: The Preaching Life


Barbara Brown Taylor, The Preaching Life (London: Cowley, 1993), 49.  
During my tenure as a coordinator of Christian education, I heard a lot from people about their hunger to know the Bible, so I hired professors from a nearby seminary and offered regular courses on the Old and New Testaments.  People told me the descriptions sounded like just what they needed, but that was usually the last I saw of them.  The classes were small and sporadically attended, while classes on religion and the arts or parenting techniques overflowed their banks. Yet every quarter, people asked for more Bible courses.  They said they wanted more; they were not getting enough.  So I offered more Bible and still no one came. 
Finally, I got the message.  “Bible” was a code word for “God.”  People were not hungry for information about the Bible; they were hungry for an experience of God, which the Bible seemed to offer them.  So I laid off the seminary professors and offered a class on biblical meditation instead, which filled up at once.  The plan was simple: every week we locked the door, took off our shoes and closed our eyes and listened to a story about the raising of Lazarus, or the feeding of the five thousand, or John’s vision of the heavenly Jerusalem. 

  • William H. Willimon: Pastor: The Theology and Practice of Ordained Ministry

Will Willimon, Pastor: The Theology and Practice of Ordained Ministry (Nashville: Abingdon Press, 2002), 71.
I therefore predict more of a pastor’s time will be spent in the education, formation, and enculturation of the members of the congregation to be people who know how to analyze the corrosive acids within the surrounding and essentially indifferent–at times openly hostile–dominant culture.  More of our efforts will need to be expended in giving our people the means to resist, to live by, and to creatively communicate the gospel in a world where Christians are a cognitive minority.  Just the other day I was talking with a pastor who formed a “Public School Teachers’ Prayer Breakfast” for the teachers in his congregation.  At this weekly breakfast, the teachers present case studies from their work that challenge their Christian faith.  They share a meal, have prayer, and venture forth better equipped to live their faith in the public-school setting . . .
There is much to be said for the pastor being educated in the classical forms of Christian ministry.  The church has much experience as a minority movement.  We need to draw from that experience today.  In that regard, I predict a recovery of the classical shape of ministry: to teach, to preach, and to evangelize through the ministries of Word, sacrament, and order.  I sense the end of a proliferation of ministerial duties and a reclamation of the essential classical tasks of Christian ministry.  Because so many of our people have not been well formed in the faith, pastors now must stress doctrine, the classical texts of our faith, our master narratives, the great themes.  The culture is no longer a prop for the church.  If we are going to make Christians, we must have a new determination to inculcate the faith.  In some ways our age parallels that of the Reformation, in which the church was faced with a vast undereducated, uninformed, unformed laity and clergy.  Pastors must be prepared to lead in catechesis, moral formation, and the regeneration of God’s people.

Peter Storey, “Rules of Engagement: Faithful Congregations in a Dangerous World,” Inaugural Lecture for Ruth W. and A. Morris Williams, Jr. Chair of the Practice of Christian Ministry at Duke University Divinity School.  Storey taught at Duke from 1999-2006.

Reclaim the Teaching Office.  Anything else I say tonight actually depends on this. I have a friend back home whose name is George Irvine, and this very fine pastor says, “If you want to get your congregation moving into mission, you’ve got to do three things:  the first is to teach. When you’ve done that, then for goodness sake, teach. That’s the second thing. And thirdly, teach!”
This has been my experience. It has been a non-negotiable in the churches I’ve served in South Africa: a central teaching and learning experience for the whole congregation, led by the best qualified people available – including certainly all the pastoral staff.  And all lay persons in leadership are required to commit to this weekly educational discipline. All newcomers must do so too, as part of joining. It’s a no-brainer. Nothing effective can happen in a church until its leaders and people begin to think theologically.
I wonder if you know how unique it is that adults attend Sunday School in the numbers they do here? It doesn’t happen anywhere else in the world. Yet most Sunday Schools follow an ad hoc approach to a curriculum which is left very much to each class to discuss and decide. What would happen if a curriculum on mission, for instance was agreed and the pastor trained all the Sunday School class leaders each week in how to teach each lesson? I used to do that with a whole lot of home group leaders when our centralized Academy for Christian Living was in recess.
Reclaiming the teaching office means that we will teach Scripture and Doctrine and Christian Practices and above all, we will, as Ted Jennings puts it, “understudy Jesus.” Above all, we want to learn the mind of that one teacher, remembering his words: “You study the Scriptures diligently supposing that in them you have eternal life, yet although their testimony points to me, you refuse to come to me for that life.” (John 5:39)
And we will also train people in the skills the world desperately needs but doesn’t know. I was speaking with Filipino delegates at the Nairobi World Council of Churches gathering about the overthrow of the tyrant President Ferdinand Marcos and how armored vehicles had to stop and bombers had to abort their bombing runs because hundreds and thousands of Christians jammed the streets. “How did you do it?” I asked. The answer: “We studied and trained for twelve years! We trained in the practice of non-violence and the prayer that is needed for it.”
To be about God’s mission in the world, we need to reclaim the teaching office.

  • Reinhold Niebuhr: Leaves from the Notebook of a Tamed Cynic

Reinhold Niebuhr, Leaves From the Notebook of a Tamed Cynic (Louisville: Westminster/John Knox Press, 1929, 1980), 16, 29.

[Neibuhr is 24] 1916. The young fellows I am trying to teach in Sunday school don’t listen to me attentively.  I don’t think I am getting very clse to where they live.  Or perhaps I just haven’t learned how to put my message across.  I am constantly interrupted in my talk by the necessity of calling someone to order.  It is a good thing that I have a class like that.  I’ll venture that my sermons aren’t getting any nearer to the people, but the little group of adults I am speaking to in the morning service are naturally more patient or at least more polite that these honest youngsters, and so I have less chance to find out from them how futile I am.  But that doesn’t solve the proble of how to reach the fellows. 

[Neibuhr is 28] 1920.  I had a great discussion in my young men’s clas this morning.  Gradually I am beginning to discover that my failure with the class was due to my talking too much.  Now I let them talk and the thing is becoming interesting.  Of course it isn’t so easy to keep the discussion steered on any track.  Sometimes we talk in circles.  But the fellows are at least getting at some of the vital problems of life and I am learning something from them.  Disciplinary problems have disappeared.  The only one left is the fellow who is always trying to say something foolish or smart in the discussion. 

Here’s a fifth bonus quote:

Howard Gardner, The Unschooled Mind: How Children Think and how Schools Should Teach (BasicBooks, 1991).
“coverage is the enemy of understanding”

Taylor University Christian Education professor Faye Chechowich’s response:
How about education as a task of “uncovering” rather than “covering”?

My conclusion and synthesis. 

I think Boston College professor Thomas Groome’s Shared Christian Praxis approach gets at all of these aspects. 

Christian Religious Education: Sharing Our Story and Vision by Thomas H. Groome (1980, 1999).  We required students to read chapter 9 and 10 in Teaching and Learning Strategies at Taylor University. 

Sharing Faith: A Comprehensive Approach to Religious Education and Pastoral Ministry : The Way of Shared Praxis by Thomas H. Groome (1991)
This book illustrates the process described in chapter 10 of Christian Religious Education.  

Groome’s book Christian Religious Education is the classic in the field.  It is a foundational book we teach in the Christian Educational Ministries program at Taylor University.  It is in the curriculum of education courses at Regent College where I did my MDiv.   And it is required in the Th.D. seminar at Duke Divinity School. 

This is from chapter 10 of Christian Religious Education.   

Movement #1
Naming Present Action

Movement #2
The Participants’ Stories and Visions

Movement #3
The Christian Community Story and Vision

Movement #4
Dialectical Hermeneutic Between The Story and the Participant’s Stories

Movement #5
Dialectical Hermeneutic Between The Vision and the Participant’s Visions

I have given a rough informal look at this process in my post: How to Lead An Impressive Bible Study

A similar flow for a lesson is Hook, Book, Look, Took in Larry Richards’s classic Creative Bible Teaching (Chicago: Moody, 1970, 1998), which we teach to freshmen in Introduction to Christian Educational Ministry at Taylor University.

Groome’s technique is to engage with the needs of the world, then draw upon the classic content, then probe possible faithful responses. I think it is perhaps easiest to think of the process the way Groome describes it in the introduction to Christian Religious Education–imitating Jesus’ approach on the walk to Emmaus in Luke 24:13-35.   

Movements 1-2.  What is going on in Jerusalem?  Get them talking about their lives. 

Movement 3.  Jesus explained the Law and Prophets.  We introduce students to life-changing content from the Christian tradition. 

Movement 4. They reflect on what they have heard and how it intersects with their lives. 

Movement 5.  The people decide to head back to Jerusalem.  Response. 

There is some food for thought on a very practical topic from some great thinkers.  Happy teaching.