Author: andy.rowell

  • Faith is not passivity so as to honor sheer pure grace

    Tim Keller quotes J. Gresham Machen—that seeking “obedience to the commands of Christ” is “works-righteousness” and “legalism.” That is outdated Pauline scholarship since E.P. Sanders’s book in 1978. No, faith is allegiance and obedience to Jesus, not absence of effort.

    John Barclay says in Galatians "Paul is not attacking a life-hermeneutic that looks to works to secure the favor of God, he is not countering an erroneous soteriology dependent on the good works of the devout. Thus his foil in this letter is not works-righteousness." P&TG, 326.

    "throughout this book, we have been suspicious of the modern (Western) ideal of the 'pure' gift … Paul emphasizes the incongruity of grace and the expectation that those who are 'under grace' … will be reoriented in the 'obedience of faith.'" John Barclay, Paul & the Gift, 412.

    Matthew Bates argues that faith is best understood as allegiance, which involves obedience. Consistent with this, "The Bible consistently teaches that we will be judged by works" (Gospel Allegiance, 113).

    Tim Keller's quote is from:
    https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/tim-keller-american-church/
    And the correct spelling is J. Gresham Machen.

    If someone prioritizes loving God and others—saying those are "more important than all burnt offerings and sacrifices," they are on the right track, "not far from the kingdom of God,” says Jesus (Mark 12:33-34). They are to be encouraged, not denounced.

    I am just critiquing that one small paragraph of Keller's essay which emphasizes faith as belief ("I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast" Lewis Carroll, Through the Looking Glass) over against faith as trying to obey Jesus. I think that is wrong-headed.

    I generally agree with Tim Keller's long rambling reflection on the American church's plight. I can't help but like people who think historically and practically and creatively about big important contemporary problems.

    Originally tweeted by Andy Rowell (@AndyRowell) on September 13, 2022.

    The problem with faith as believing hard-to-believe ideas is that long-time followers of Jesus find themselves paralyzed by doubt and people interested in Jesus think that they must believe before they obey. People who are trying to follow Jesus for many years will have moments where they ask whether they believe in the resurrection and will be embarrassed and afraid of their doubts but they still admire and love Jesus and realize their sinfulness. They are still dedicated to following Jesus. They have faith in terms of allegiance. Their spiritual or religious life need not come to a halt in crisis. They can continue to try to follow Jesus. They have the faith of a mustard seed. And in a similar way, the seeker, the person interested in Christianity, need not wait until they believe more confidently before they begin following Jesus. If they admire Jesus, they can begin to demonstrate allegiance to his way—to him. They should not be dissuaded from trying out his way because they don’t believe the whole theological scheme yet.

  • Who is elected and chosen by God?

    Brief thread with a few quotes because someone asked whether individuals are chosen by God to be saved or damned (according to Christianity). (This is an issue that most Christians agonize rarely about because the concepts below are quite commonly held today).

    "In fact, there is not a single passage in the Bible that explicitly affirms that specific individuals (apart from God’s Son) have been chosen before creation for either eternal life or eternal damnation."
    @MatthewWBates, Gospel Allegiance (Brazos Press, 2019), 84.

    Oliver Crisp on Karl Barth's view:
    "All human agents are elect only in the derivative sense of having a saving relation to the set of the elect and its single member, Christ."

    https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/themelios/article/on-barths-denial-of-universalism/

    “For God’s eternal election of grace is concretely the election of Jesus Christ . . . And we in the world … are elected and willed by God in Him.”
    – Karl Barth, Church Dogmatics, IV/2 (1958), p. 31, 33.

    Limited atonement (double predestination) or universalism (all are saved)? “If God told us the answer to the problem in advance of the eschaton, we would harm ourselves on one side or the other.”
    — Bruce McCormack, “So That He May Be Merciful to All,” 240.

    "churches need to be responsible for all … And for that reason, I would say, neither limited atonement nor universalism should ever be made church dogma."
    — Bruce McCormack, "So That He May Be Merciful to All: Karl Barth and the Problem of Universalism," (2011), 241.

    Timing of salvation is inexact because "Jesus Christ is not only the one who has come (in the incarnation); He is also the One who comes (in the power of the eschatological Spirit); and the One who will come (in His visible return)."
    — Bruce McCormack, "So That He …", 247-248.

    Jesus on people trying to figure out who is and who is not a child of God.
    “The servants asked him, ‘Do you want us to go and pull them up?’
    “‘No,’ he answered, ‘because while you are pulling the weeds, you may uproot the wheat with them."
    — Matthew 13:28-29.

    Originally tweeted by Andy Rowell (@AndyRowell) on September 10, 2022.

  • Association for Theological Schools statistics 2021-2022

    Some 2021-2022 Association for Theological Schools statistics


    Largest Seminaries by Head Count
    1. Liberty University John W. Rawlings School of Divinity
    2. Southern Baptist Theological Seminary
    3. Midwestern Baptist Theological Seminary
    4. Dallas Theological Seminary

    Largest Seminaries by Full Time Equivalent enrollment
    1. Liberty University John W. Rawlings School of Divinity
    2. Southern Baptist Theological Seminary
    3. Midwestern Baptist Theological Seminary
    4. Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary
    5. Asbury Theological Seminary

    Most Full Time Faculty
    1. New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary
    2. Talbot School of Theology
    3. Dallas Theological Seminary
    4. University of Notre Dame Department of Theology
    5. Candler School of Theology
    6. Asbury Theological Seminary
    7. Southern Baptist Theological Seminary

    The most increase in student head count from 2011-12 to 2021-22.
    1. Liberty University John W. Rawlings School of Divinity
    2. Midwestern Baptist Theological Seminary
    3. Southern Baptist Theological Seminary
    4. Dallas Theological Seminary
    5. Wesley Seminary

    The most % increase in student head count from 2011-12 to 2021-22.
    1. Midwestern Baptist Theological Seminary
    2. Puritan Reformed Theological Seminary
    3. Kairos University
    4. Central Baptist Theological Seminary
    5. Wesley Biblical Seminary
    6. Shepherds Theological Seminary

    The most increase in student Full Time Equivalent enrollment from 2011-12 to 2021-22.
    1. Liberty University John W. Rawlings School of Divinity
    2. Midwestern Baptist Theological Seminary
    3. Grand Canyon Theological Seminary
    4. Wesley Seminary
    5. Grace School of Theology

    The most % increase in student Full Time Equivalent enrollment from 2011-12 to 2021-22.
    1. Midwestern Baptist Theological Seminary
    2. Central Baptist Theological Seminary
    3. Canadian Reformed Theological Seminary
    4. Kairos University
    5. Shepherds Theological Seminary

    Highest spending by the institution:
    1. Princeton Theological Seminary
    2. Fuller Theological Seminary
    3. Dallas Theological Seminary
    4. Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary
    5. Southern Baptist Theological Seminary
    6. Harvard University Divinity School

    Highest Endowment or Long-Term Investments:
    1. Princeton Theological Seminary
    2. Harvard University Divinity School
    3. Yale University Divinity School
    4. Candler School of Theology
    5. Duke University Divinity School
    6. Columbia Theological Seminary

    Highest expenditure per student head count
    1. McGill University School of Religious Studies
    2. Pontifical College Josephinum
    3. Princeton Theological Seminary
    4. St. Patrick’s Seminary and University
    5. Virginia Theological Seminary
    6. Kenrick-Glennon Seminary

    Highest expenditure per Full-Time Equivalent student
    1. Pontifical College Josephinum
    2. Sacred Heart Major Seminary
    3. Pope St. John XXIII National Seminary
    4. University of the South School of Theology
    5. Chapman Seminary
    6. Princeton Theological Seminary

    Least cost for MDiv tuition for one year
    not including schools that listed a 0 because they don’t offer an MDiv or it is free (?).
    1. North Park Theological Seminary
    2. Erskine Theological Seminary
    3. Antiochian House of Studies
    4. Canadian Reformed Theological Seminary

    There are 53 schools where the Full Time Faculty and Full Time Equivalent Faculty are equal so it seems no adjunct (part-time) professors are used.

    There are 31 schools where adjuncts teach 60% of the courses (the Faculty FT / Faculty FTE is .4 or less).

    Here are the schools with the lowest percentage of Full Time Faculty to Student Head Count.

    Here is the Excel Document I made with the ATS data.

    or https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1G9UTpHYZ_pHDSjW1qgnwa-A_r0rSnVCM/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=114188792349905334342&rtpof=true&sd=true

    It is from the pdf document Annual Data Tables of the Association for Theological Schools website.

    https://www.ats.edu/Annual-Data-Tables

    Originally tweeted by Andy Rowell (@AndyRowell) on June 21, 2022.