Categories
Blogging

My List of 80 Church Leadership Blogs I am watching

Here are the blogs I am currently watching.  I am using the free
Google Reader as my feedcatcher on
my free iGoogle page which I use as my home page.  This is the
sequel to my post My List of
the 70 Best Church Leadership Blogs
from February 2007.  I explained
my choices in that post.  This list is totally subjective.  Browse through and see if anything is interesting.  Here is the link if you want to see the newest posts from these 80 Church Leadership blogs  – there is also a link there to get you started with Google Reader and my feed from the 80 blogs.  Feel free to list your
blog or others you recommend in the comments. 

Note to blog writers:  Because I subscribe to lots of blogs, I usually only read the titles of posts and if they don’t grab me, I skip them.  So take care how you title.  If the title isn’t clear, I do not know the subject of the post and will probably ignore it.  So be informative about the content of the post in the title!    


Categories
Job Search Pastor's Life

How to meet with your supervisor

The problem: You work at a church but you do not meet regularly with your supervisor or your meetings with your supervisor are ineffective. 

A study has shown that liking one's supervisor is the number one factor related to job satisfaction.  You can put up with a lot if you like your immediate supervisor.  Here is the summary quote from the book:

"The talented employee may join a company because of its charismatic
leaders, its generous benefits, and its world class training programs, but
how long that employee stays and how productive they are while they are
there is determined by their relationship with their immediate
supervisor"
(Marcus Buckingham and Curt Coffman, First Break All the Rules: What the World's Greatest Managers Do Differently. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1999, pp. 11-12). 

If your satisfaction and fruitfulness depend largely on your relationship with your supervisor, it is pretty important that you have good meetings with them. 

Below I have listed two main points about meeting with your supervisor. 

1. Ask to meet with your supervisor for 1 hour once every two weeks or 1/2 hour once per week.  The "open door policy" (My door is always open) isn't concrete enough and either wastes too much time or doesn't provide enough meaningful interaction.  Conscientious followers often don't want to waste the supervisor's time so they wait to ask questions until a problem has grown into a full-blown mess.  Instead set up a time to meet regularly. 

Jim Collins writes,

"If you have the right people on the bus, the problem of how to
motivate and manage people largely goes away.  The right people don't
need to be tightly managed or fired up; they will be self-motivated by
the inner drive to produce the best results and to be part of creating
something great" (Jim Collins, Good to Great. New York: HarperCollins, 2001, p. 42).

As a good follower / employee / church leader, you do not need help on every single task, but you do need to be pointed in the right direction.  If you are working 40-50 hours per week, having a 1/2 hour of direction is not too much to ask and makes a lot of sense.      

2. Have a numbered agenda of 5-10 questions that you wish to raise with your supervisor.  Provide the supervisor with a copy when you begin the meeting.  These items should include things you feel the supervisor should know, questions you have related to current projects you are working on, and hopefully something you can affirm your supervisor about.   Save most of your questions for that meeting rather than sending your supervisor a million emails throughout the week.  My supervisor would acknowledge each question and reflect more deeply on the questions he felt were most important or he was able to answer. 

The list of questions emphasizes that you are prepared and that you value the person's time.  It also gives them an idea of the issues that are on your mind.  They need not all be strategic, task-oriented issues.  You can also ask the person questions that are not urgent but are important.  Here's a sample one I remember asking a mentor: "what do you do when you hear that someone from the congregation has died – can you walk me through that?"

Perry Noble, pastor of NewSpring Church, has an excellent post today entitled:My Five Rules For Meeting With A Mentor. My comments above particularly resonate with this quote from Perry's post:

I remember John Maxwell saying to me once, “I will mentor you, but you
have to ask the questions. I am not preparing a lesson for you…YOU
guide this meeting. If you want to know something–ASK. If you don’t ask
anything then we don’t really have anything to talk about.”

Conclusion:

David Swanson notes the importance of meeting with mentors for your own productivity and satisfaction. 

"Those of us who itch for change are faced with the fact that, in most
cases, it is the senior leadership’s prerogative to initiate those
changes. This can be a frustrating reality for a young leader. Our
options are to give up on large-scale change, disconnect from the
church to attempt our own new thing, or drink a lot of coffee. Tea
works too.

A couple of years into my time as an associate pastor I began
scheduling regular breakfasts, afternoon coffee breaks, and evening
conversations with some of our church’s Boomer leaders. These
conversations were agenda-free. It was a chance to talk about past
experiences, current challenges, and future possibilities for our
church. The only measure of success was that coffee was consumed and
good conversation was had.

Over time, as relationships developed, it became apparent that my
ministry ideas were being met with more acceptance. Some of my new
ideas even became conversation topics among our older leaders. It was
deeply satisfying to participate in a strategic vision for the church
that had begun as a conversation over coffee. Don’t underestimate the
importance of investing in relationships" (Leadership Journal's blog Out of Ur Disarming the Boomers (Part 2) from January 17, 2008).

As the book title Never Eat Alone implies, relationships are key for getting things done both in the business world and in the church. 

Examples

I have listed a couple of examples below of agendas I made before meeting with mentors and supervisors. 

Example 1: Agenda for meeting with a senior pastor of a neighboring church that I had never met  in 2004.  I had scheduled the meeting to learn from him.

  • Where are you from? When did you start pastoring? What did you do before that?
  • What do you feel is going well at _________ Church?
  • What are the challenges?
  • Since we share the same neighborhood, what are the neighborhood issues for you all like parking, etc.?
  • How has your seminary experience prepared you for ministry?
  • Why the “team leader” title?
  • What “direction” is your church moving in?   

Example 2: Here is another example of a weekly meeting from 2002 with my supervisor (which I handed him a copy of)

  1. How are you? 
  2. Additional agenda items?
  3. I am beginning Family Camp planning for next year this week.  Do you have any advice?
  4. I received an email from D.T. about his concern about incorporating new people into worship teams.  Comments?
  5. We are furthering Ensemble Leaders Song Selection Criteria.  Is that proceeding well in your opinion?
  6. Family Carol Service.  We are ordering from a script to adapt (19.99-24.99 US) Group Publishing.  Just wanted you to know.   
  7. We have received two estimates on IT service maintenance. 
  8. I am thankful to G.R. for his major assistance these last few weeks.
  9. I tried a new strategy last week for announcements and it seemed to go well.   Input?
  10. J.S. is no longer attending our church.  He is attending ________ Church.   
  11. Prayer item: I need ________. 
  12. K.V. will be back visiting January 22.
Categories
Young Adults

Should you use technology to reach young adults or offer them something wholly different?

There are some pastors who work with youth and college students who say, "We cannot compete with the world in terms of technology and entertainment.  What we can offer is relationships.  We need to focus on people, not programs." 

Similarly, many people from liturgical traditions report that the young adults they know are turning to liturgical traditions and mystery and contemplation. 

See for example Christianity Today’s February cover story:

Chris Armstrong | posted 2/08/2008
Christianity Today

In this month’s Chronicle of Higher Education, there is a similar story by a University of Virginia professor suggesting that college professors need to help their students slow down and think, rather than pursuing the latest technological teaching technique.  The article is a must read for people who have an interest in college students because I have never read a better description of the internet generation.   

Dwelling in Possibilities: Our students’ spectacular hunger for life makes them radically vulnerable

By MARK EDMUNDSON

ChronicleReview.com

From the issue dated March 14, 2008

Hat tip to Gary Friesen


Five comments about whether the answer to reaching young adults in the church is to use technology or to offer them something totally different.
 

1. In the church, you have to motivate people to come back.
  It is probably appropriate for an English teacher with very highly motivated University of Virginia students to try to slow them down.  As a professor the last two years at Taylor University, I was amazed at the power the professor had over students in comparison to being a pastor.  As a pastor you need to motivate people to want to come back.  As a university professor, they have to come back – their grades depend upon it. 

2. Excellence in communication and teaching needs to be pursued.
I would not want university professors to rest on the fact that students don’t need technology, they just need old school teaching methods.  College students need outstanding classroom teaching to interest to help them engage the subject.  Regardless of the style, technology or no technology, the teaching task still needs to be done well.   Ditto, churches.   

3.  The liturgical tradition is certainly not winning the day in terms of any sociological measure that I have seen.  Roman Catholics and Mainline churches are losing great numbers of people.  Many are becoming evangelicals.  But also many are becoming "no-religious affiliation."   See Pew’s Survey The Religious Landscape of the United States for the latest example.  "While nearly one-in-three Americans (31%) were raised in the Catholic
faith, today fewer than one-in-four (24%) describe themselves as
Catholic. These losses would have been even more pronounced were it not
for the offsetting impact of immigration . . .  members of mainline Protestant churches and Jews are older, on average, than members of other groups."  There is much confounding here: there are too many variables to sort out why people are turning away from mainline and Catholic churches but I am simply pointing out that liturgy is no automatic solution for attracting young people. 

4.  I like liturgical and nonliturgical churches and I think they can both learn from one another.  I think it is great to have liturgical churches and I have tried to push all of the evangelical churches I have pastored to greater appreciation of the church’s past and to implement forms of liturgy thoughtfully.  However, when I am around people (often connected to Wheaton College or Duke Divinity School) who argue that informal liturgical styles are woefully lacking, I tend to defend "the three songs and a biblical sermon" evangelical-style as having much to commend it.   

5. I continue to argue that pastors need to think like educators or missionaries.
  Educators who teach second grade, gear their programs to that age level.  We have to do the same in the church.  Meet people where they are at.  Similarly, missionaries to a new culture, need to speak the language of the people.  Though I agree with the Professor Edmundson that sometimes the culture is poisonous and needs to be critiqued – he argues that the frenetic lifestyle of students hurts their ability to understand life – we also will not be able to critique that culture until we demonstrate (as he has) that we know it well.  What I mean is that churches, if they expect to be effective at reaching un-churched or de-churched people with the gospel, need to be able to communicate with them.  I think the question, "How will someone experience our church if this is their first time here?" is an extremely important question and people need not betray their tradition to address it.  They may simply need to explain their tradition better so that the new person has a better experience.

I think there is great reason to be suspicious of highly fragmented lives powered relentlessly forward by dizzying forms of technology.  However, I do not think that purposefully anti-technological liturgy communicates clearly enough with many people who are immersed in American culture.  We need meet un-churched and de-churched people half-way with modest uses of technology and draw them into community and contemplation from there.